Apparently there is a bit of a Herodotus revival going on. Who knew? The TLS reviews three new books about Herodotus this week. I read the essay this morning and it made me want to call in sick to work just so I could stay home and read Histories all day. How could I want to work when the essay says this:

So is Herodotus a transmitter of accurate historical data? Or is he an entertaining raconteur, suitable for children and for the audiences of action movies[300]? Or should he be seen as the founding father of pernicious Orientalism in the sense that term was used by Edward Said – of Western imperialist fantasies? The answer is that he is all three, and the triangular tension between these lines of interpretation underpins the revival of interest in his Histories recently.

I am after all on the cusp of starting book VII which has the battle of Thermopylae in it. And book VIII has the battle of Salamis which Aeschylus fought in (someboby mentioned that in a comment not long ago) and wrote a play, Persians about. I am going to have to schedule a reading of the play along with my reading of book VIII so I can make a comparison.

The essay made all three books in the review sound good, but I can’t help but lust most after the Cambridge University Press book, Herodotus: Histories Book VIII edited by A.M. Bowie. They are publishing a commentary on each of Herodotus’s nine books/chapters and they sound quite accessible to the average reader. The books are not being published in order. The other one available is Herodotus: Histories Book IX edited by Michael Flower and John Matincola.

As if all the Herodotus yumminess weren’t enough, I leave you with a photo of Waldo, Dickens and Godzilla all napping together in a moment of peace and quiet. This does not happen often. And get a load of those book piles! Jeez, someone oughta do something about them ;)

Advertisement