When a little over a month ago I received an email query from the good folks at Atlas & Co asking, given I had mentioned being interested in Madame de Staël in a blog post a while back, would I like a review copy of Francine du Plessix Gray’s book Madame de Staël: The First Modern Woman? Would I? And how! The book arrived and it turned out to be a tidy little thing of 233 pages cut about a third smaller than the average book dimension. I love smaller books because they fit so nicely in my hand, and this is one of those perfect book sizes.
Germaine Necker de Staël’s father, Jacques Necker, was, for a time, a famous and well-loved economist in France. He was one of those people whose ideas and character fit perfectly a certain time period but when times changed he was unable to change with them and he ended up being forced out of France and back to his native Switzerland. Germaine’s mother was an intelligent woman who decided she was going to have the most famous salon in Paris. She managed but it was work. She was not a great conversationalist and made notes and planned what to say to certain people ahead of time. She was also quite the task master when it came to Germaine’s education, forcing the study of math, geography, science, languages and theology on her by the time she was three! Lucky for Germaine she was a bright girl and learned quickly. That, however, did not keep her from having a nervous breakdown by the time she was twelve.
While her mother was rigid and demanding, her father was relaxed and playful. She loved her father deeply and said more than once if he had not been her father she would have married him. Germaine was a good match and suitable prospects were tossed away more than once. Finally, her parents arranged for her to marry a Swedish nobleman, Eric Magnus de Staël Holstein, eighteen years her senior. As part of the marriage settlement, King Gustavus of Sweden appointed Staël to the Swedish embassy in Paris in exchange for a French island in the Caribbean. Unfortunately for Germaine, her new husband turned out to be rather dull and had a gambling problem. Lucky for Germaine, in the marriage settlement she got to keep her own fortune otherwise her new husband would have drowned them both in debt.
Germaine set up house in the Swedish Embassy in Paris with the goal of having the best Salon in Paris. She was everything her mother was not, quick witted, perceptive, spontaneous. Plus, she truly loved conversation, a skill and art that she took to new heights. Germaine’s salons were were somewhat literary but politics is what she was interested in. And because she could not herself be a politician she worked tirelessly behind the scenes supporting the men whose ideas agreed with hers. She was a powerful woman, so powerful that when Napoleon came to power he eventually forced her into exile from France because she refused to support him and he hated her for it.
I could go on and on, Madame de Staël is such a fascinating woman. I enjoyed the book very much even though I was also disappointed in it. Given title and author (Gray–or is it properly du Plessix Gray?–had been nominated for a Pulitzer for a previous book) I was expecting some in depth study of life and times but that was missing. There really is no explanation about how or why Germaine is the first modern woman and I’d expected it since it is in the title. Am I supposed to just agree and take the author’s word for it? There is also no analysis or thought about how Madame de Staël as a woman managed to obtain such power. It is suggested that men loved her but it is not so clear as to why they loved her so much when she was so demanding and used her relationships to her benefit. Nor is it clear why, for a woman who was such a genius at politics, she thought that Napoleon would let her return to Paris because she wrote such successful books. Simply saying she was naive is not good enough.
All that aside, however, Madame de Staël was an enjoyable read. It zips along through de Staël’s whirlwind of a life and I arrived at the end out of breath and disappointed the woman died so soon at the age of 51. The book is a very good introduction to, just enough to make me want to know more. It is an appetizer, the delicious kind that leaves you wanting more.
I found this fascinating to read! Mme de Stael is someone I never knew much about, although I had a basic outline. Like you, I would have been frustrated by those omissions, but I can see that they are also tantalising in their way. Are you going to read Mme de Stael’s works now? I think I have Corinne ou l’Italie somewhere. She must be quite hard to get hold of. Oh what am I saying? You work in a library! Well, I’ll be very intrigued if you take your reading any further.
Litlove, I am so glad found it interesting. I didn’t know much about de Stael either so even though the book wasn’t what I expected, I still enjoyed it very much. I have Corrine, it is such a fat thing i don’t know when I will get to it, but I would really like to read it. And even though I work in a library, she is hard to get hold of in English, you have the enviable ability to read her in French.
She sounds interesting, although I’m embarrassed to only have a familiarity with the name, not in any depth at all. “…Plus, she truly loved conversation, a skill and art that she took to new heights.” I wish I had that skill!
Don’t worry about not having heard of her. I think she might be enjoying a bit of a revival in the nonfiction department because there were several new books out about her this year. I wish I had great conversation skills too but I am of the miserable who always think of the good things to say on the way home from the party!
Ah! I have to admit that when I saw your title, I got instantly querulous (“ah, what does she mean, “first modern woman”? What are we doing of all these marvelous earlier female writers and masterminds? Are we calling them primitives? Blablabla”) — but of course you handled that deftly, and it didn’t even originate with you.
Like Daphne I am fascinated by some of the woman’s accomplishments – but there are some other that leave me wondering. She is such a puzzle to me! This sheds a little welcome light.
Charlotte, oh you made me laugh! The title is definitely one to invite a quarrel. The woman is fascinating and puzzling and this brief biography has left me wanting to know more about her.
I agree with you – if I’m going to read a biography, I like one that goes into some serious depth on the subject, even if it means I’m wading through a huge tome! But this sounds like it was interesting enough to whet your appetite!
Emily, for a short biography though it does a good job. I was just expecting it to be less biography and more of a critical look at her life and role in French politics. Guess I will have to find another book to that!
I love Charlotte’s rant. She stated it perfectly.
As for the title, hook. It was either never there or edited out.
Carrie, Charlotte does say it just right, doesn’t she? I suspect the hook was never really there in the first place.
I would be pleased at the prospect of a short biography, but not with such important omissions! I really want to know why she is the first modern woman, and I wonder what it means to be a modern woman!
Check out the work and research of Karyna Szmurlo regarding this author and Corrine.