<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Vice of Reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://somanybooksblog.com/2009/11/12/the-vice-of-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://somanybooksblog.com/2009/11/12/the-vice-of-reading/</link>
	<description>the agony and ecstasy of a reading life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:53:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edith Wharton &#171; So Many Books</title>
		<link>http://somanybooksblog.com/2009/11/12/the-vice-of-reading/#comment-48847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edith Wharton &#171; So Many Books]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somanybooksblog.com/?p=3109#comment-48847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 22, 2010 by Stefanie    After reading Edith Wharton&#8217;s essay The Vice of Reading back in November I wanted to find out more about her so when she was chosen to make the rounds of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 22, 2010 by Stefanie    After reading Edith Wharton&#8217;s essay The Vice of Reading back in November I wanted to find out more about her so when she was chosen to make the rounds of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBR Challenge and Binge Reading &#171; So Many Books</title>
		<link>http://somanybooksblog.com/2009/11/12/the-vice-of-reading/#comment-47888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TBR Challenge and Binge Reading &#171; So Many Books]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somanybooksblog.com/?p=3109#comment-47888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Wharton by Hermione Lee. After the Vice of Reading essay I decided I wanted to read more about Wharton and then she was chosen for the January [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wharton by Hermione Lee. After the Vice of Reading essay I decided I wanted to read more about Wharton and then she was chosen for the January [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nish</title>
		<link>http://somanybooksblog.com/2009/11/12/the-vice-of-reading/#comment-47772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somanybooksblog.com/?p=3109#comment-47772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, that is the case now, isn&#039;t it.

Forget about even reading the book, people demand tat books be banned just based on the idea]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, that is the case now, isn&#8217;t it.</p>
<p>Forget about even reading the book, people demand tat books be banned just based on the idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefanie</title>
		<link>http://somanybooksblog.com/2009/11/12/the-vice-of-reading/#comment-47727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefanie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somanybooksblog.com/?p=3109#comment-47727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sylvia, you are right, intelligence isn&#039;t democratic, but I agree with you that there is no harm in encouraging mechanical readers to try to improve their reading by selecting good books. I think Wharton would be appalled by a world that where death threats could stop a book from being published. And isn&#039;t peptonized great? I love that word!

Charlotte, I agree, there is a mechanical reader lurking in all of us. It is so easy to slip into the habit because it is such and easy habit to have! 

Abbi, your example is quite a compelling argument in Wharton&#039;s favor and I must admit to you being right. I think we should encourage everyone to read, but clearly, there are some who take to it like a duck to water and others for whom it will always be a chore.

Dorothy, I like your take on the essay, types of readers makes sense. The ones who want to improve their reading should be supported in that. And will I be whipped if I say the people who don&#039;t want to read should not be made to feel badly about it?

Daphne, oh yes, I&#039;d class you with the intuitive reader. But I think we all slip into mechanical now and then.

Litlove, I&#039;ve been doing some investigating after your comment and you are right, Wharton was not being tongue-in-cheek. She could be a rather, er, assertive person. The argument rages on and will continue to rage on as long as there are readers and non-readers. Hopefully there will be lots of readers for a very long time!

Susan, wow, it doesn&#039;t even sound like you and your sister are really from the same family! Amazing how things like that work out. I too hope that the ones who will never be readers are a small subset. Number bear it out, but we can keep hoping that will change!

JeanShin7, I love your metaphors! I wonder if we can argue that good literature makes you thin and junk books make ou fat? Imagine, the Virginia Woolf diet, lose 10 pounds in 10 days! ;) And thanks for letting me know about WSJ, it was a pleasant surprise!

Heahter, LOL, yeah, a classic black and white possibly as horrifying as Creature from the Black Lagoon or The Blob :)

Dadeo, exclusive clubs aren&#039;t fair and that&#039;s why Wharton&#039;s essay chaffs me a bit. I find it admirable that you are developing as a reader. I think even people who call themselves intuitive readers could always work at being better too. It&#039;s not a competition. The point is to enjoying reading and that is something everyone can do.

happyclam, hello and welcome! There are few worse things than forced reading. What a slog that can be even for people who love to read. I love that you carry poetry in your handbag to black-tie events! It is always good to be prepared!

Carrie, one person&#039;s trash is another&#039;s treasure, right? Still, I hope I somehow manage to find a balance between trash and the good stuff but I wouldn&#039;t want to ask Wharton for her opinion!

Maire, I hope you found the essay an amusing and thought-provoking read. You are right, there is something that feels right about it but it gets buried in the meanness and snobbery.

andalucy, LOL, maybe you are right. I&#039;ll bet Wharton secretly loved sensationalist fiction or something like that. Thanks for you kind words and the link! Too bad we couldn&#039;t have connected before you left Minneapolis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sylvia, you are right, intelligence isn&#8217;t democratic, but I agree with you that there is no harm in encouraging mechanical readers to try to improve their reading by selecting good books. I think Wharton would be appalled by a world that where death threats could stop a book from being published. And isn&#8217;t peptonized great? I love that word!</p>
<p>Charlotte, I agree, there is a mechanical reader lurking in all of us. It is so easy to slip into the habit because it is such and easy habit to have! </p>
<p>Abbi, your example is quite a compelling argument in Wharton&#8217;s favor and I must admit to you being right. I think we should encourage everyone to read, but clearly, there are some who take to it like a duck to water and others for whom it will always be a chore.</p>
<p>Dorothy, I like your take on the essay, types of readers makes sense. The ones who want to improve their reading should be supported in that. And will I be whipped if I say the people who don&#8217;t want to read should not be made to feel badly about it?</p>
<p>Daphne, oh yes, I&#8217;d class you with the intuitive reader. But I think we all slip into mechanical now and then.</p>
<p>Litlove, I&#8217;ve been doing some investigating after your comment and you are right, Wharton was not being tongue-in-cheek. She could be a rather, er, assertive person. The argument rages on and will continue to rage on as long as there are readers and non-readers. Hopefully there will be lots of readers for a very long time!</p>
<p>Susan, wow, it doesn&#8217;t even sound like you and your sister are really from the same family! Amazing how things like that work out. I too hope that the ones who will never be readers are a small subset. Number bear it out, but we can keep hoping that will change!</p>
<p>JeanShin7, I love your metaphors! I wonder if we can argue that good literature makes you thin and junk books make ou fat? Imagine, the Virginia Woolf diet, lose 10 pounds in 10 days! <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  And thanks for letting me know about WSJ, it was a pleasant surprise!</p>
<p>Heahter, LOL, yeah, a classic black and white possibly as horrifying as Creature from the Black Lagoon or The Blob <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Dadeo, exclusive clubs aren&#8217;t fair and that&#8217;s why Wharton&#8217;s essay chaffs me a bit. I find it admirable that you are developing as a reader. I think even people who call themselves intuitive readers could always work at being better too. It&#8217;s not a competition. The point is to enjoying reading and that is something everyone can do.</p>
<p>happyclam, hello and welcome! There are few worse things than forced reading. What a slog that can be even for people who love to read. I love that you carry poetry in your handbag to black-tie events! It is always good to be prepared!</p>
<p>Carrie, one person&#8217;s trash is another&#8217;s treasure, right? Still, I hope I somehow manage to find a balance between trash and the good stuff but I wouldn&#8217;t want to ask Wharton for her opinion!</p>
<p>Maire, I hope you found the essay an amusing and thought-provoking read. You are right, there is something that feels right about it but it gets buried in the meanness and snobbery.</p>
<p>andalucy, LOL, maybe you are right. I&#8217;ll bet Wharton secretly loved sensationalist fiction or something like that. Thanks for you kind words and the link! Too bad we couldn&#8217;t have connected before you left Minneapolis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andalucy</title>
		<link>http://somanybooksblog.com/2009/11/12/the-vice-of-reading/#comment-47710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andalucy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somanybooksblog.com/?p=3109#comment-47710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps Wharton was once seduced by a junk book that she enjoyed illicitly in secret places, and she wrote this essay as a kind of penance.

I love your blog! I discovered it today, too, from the WSJ article. I lived in lovely Minneapolis too until a couple months ago.

I posted about this essay on my blog today and linked back to you. I&#039;m interested to see what my friends think of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Wharton was once seduced by a junk book that she enjoyed illicitly in secret places, and she wrote this essay as a kind of penance.</p>
<p>I love your blog! I discovered it today, too, from the WSJ article. I lived in lovely Minneapolis too until a couple months ago.</p>
<p>I posted about this essay on my blog today and linked back to you. I&#8217;m interested to see what my friends think of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

