I have sunk so far into vacation mode already that I forgot to blog yesterday and by the time I remembered, prompted from a question from Bookman, “what did you blog about today?” it was simply too late to bother. I’ll do it in the morning. But morning came and the day has slipped by and here I am at the usual blogging time to tell you about two slim Kurt Vonnegut books the kind people at Seven Stories Press sent me.
God Bless You, Dr. Kevorkian was originally a series of ninety-second pieces that Vonnegut did for WNYC public radio. In book-form, these twenty pieces on near-death trips to the pearly gates, made with the help of Dr. Kevorkian, are filled with biting humor. We never know who might be waiting at the gates for a chat. Sometimes it is someone famous, sometimes someone infamous. Early on we get to meet Salvador Biagini, a 70-year-old retired construction worker recently deceased from suffering a heart attack while rescuing his schnauzer, Teddy, from attack by a pit bull. I’ll let Vonnegut finish:
The pit bull, with no previous record of violence against man or beast, jumped a four-foot fence in order to have at Teddy. Mr. Biagini, an unarmed man with a history of heart trouble, grabbed him, allowing the schnauzer to run away. So the pit bull bit Mr. Biagini in several places and then Mr. Biagini’s heart quit beating, never to beat again.
I asked this heroic pet lover how it felt to have died for a schnauzer named Teddy. Salvador Biagini was philosophical. He said it sure as heck beat dying for absolutely nothing in the Viet Nam War.
We meet The John Brown, unrepentant, who calls into question America’s unquestioned belief in the goodness of Thomas Jefferson, a man who wrote the immortal words, “all men are created equal” while owning slaves.
Others who make an appearance are Clarence Darrow, Eugenge Victor Debs, Adolf HItler, romance language expert and children’s book writer Frances Keane, and many, many others. Eventually the near-death trips have to stop though because of Dr. Kevorkian’s legal troubles.
God Bless You, Dr. Kervorkian is a zippy read. It only took me two and a half short train rides to get through. And if you read the book in public, I promise someone will stare at you because of the book’s title.
The second book, Like Shaking Hands with God, is the record of two conversations about writing between Vonnegut and author Lee Stringer that took place in October 1998 and January 1999. Both men, each from very different backgrounds, have some interesting things to say about writing. Heh. I wonder if this is true for readers and bloggers too?
Vonnegut remarks that when he teaches writing he isn’t looking for people who want to be writers:
I’m looking for people who are passionate, who care terribly about something. There are people with a hell of a lot on their minds, Lee being a case in point, and if you have a hell of a lot on your mind, the language will arrive, the right words will arrive, the paragraph will be right.
This makes it sound like Vonnegut believes in the writer as conduit theory where the words and the story just come to you and you are just taking dictation. I’m pretty sure he doesn’t subscribe to that theory. What I think he means is that a good writer needs to have something to say first and then the writing style and technique, etc will come later. Content before form.
One of the benefits of being a writer, says Vonnegut, is that writers are “able to treat their neuroses every day by writing.”
But the conversation isn’t just about writing, it is about reading too because if you are a writer, you by necessity need a reader. But Vonnegut isn’t bothered by what seems to be a decline in the number of people who read:
And of course literature is the only art that requires our audience to be performers. You have to be able to read and you have to be able to read awfully well. You have to read so well that you get irony! I’ll say one thing meaning another, and you’ll get it. Expecting a large number of people to be literate is like expecting everybody to play the French horn. It is extremely difficult. And as I’ve said in this book here [Timequake], when we think about what reading is…it’s in horizontal lines in only twenty-six phonetic symbols, ten arabic numbers, and about eight punctuation marks. And yet there are people like you who can look at a printed page and put on shows in your head – the battle of Waterloo, for God’s sake.
Reading is pretty amazing when you look at it that way, isn’t it?
Like Shaking Hands With God is also a slim book that took me only a couple of short train rides to read. Both books are tasty little morsels that can be enjoyed whether or not you have read a lot of Vonnegut. I have only read Slaughterhouse Five but after these two, I’ll definitely be reading more.
<3 Vonnegut so much. These sound like good short reads! I will look them up next time I need a Vonnegut fix. I always end up thinking deep thoughts after reading him.
Good for you, getting into vacation mode!
Oh, I love Vonnegut so much, and every time someone pulls a paragraph of his, I remember how much and pledge to myself that I’ll read more of his work. I love that PUNCH he often puts at the end of paragraphs, like the one about dying for the schnauzer.
Oh, how I love this man. I have not read the selections you talked about in this post, but I enjoyed this conversation nonetheless. I particularly loved the quotation at the end where he’s talking about the expectations that are placed on a reader. I’ve never thought of it in this light. Yet, it makes perfect sense. We are only as good (as readers) as our reading ability and reading imagination allow us to be.
I don’t know what else you’ve read by Vonnegut, but his novels are surely fabulous.
Thanks for this.
I will confess that I have never read Vonnegut, and haven’t been particularly motivated to. But these sound most intriguing, and perhaps a good, if eccentric, place to start with him.
I love Vonnegut, thanks for this article.
If you’re looking for something to read after “Slaughterhouse five”, I would recommend “Cat’s cradle” (odd sci-fi book, the kind Vonnegut used to write) and “Bluebeard”, which is great if you like abstract expressionism and painting in general.
Good for you to be so into vacation mode that you forget to post–that’s a good sign, I think! I’ll be joining you (in vacation mode that is) tomorrow. I’ve never read Vonnegut, though I love that last excerpt–I like the idea of being a performer, and a talented one at that.
I hope Vonnegut wouldn’t disapprove of my saying this: it might be a good time for us to do some Paul Revere-ing on the Internet–today the FCC is passing down the first of the Net Neutrality rulings. Al Franken on HuffPo (scroll down middle column there) says we should be outraged, and he doesn’t usually exaggerate. The Internet should not be headed toward corporate blogs buying the fast lane and the rest of us stuck in slow.
Not sure where to make our voice heard, by emailing the White House or maybe the FCC page with How To Make ECFS Express Comments? It might be good if non-corporate websites had a community way for us to alert each other when something important like this comes up. Please consider passing it on.
Daphne, oh yes, since you love Vonnegut, you would especially enjoy these two.
Emily, yes, that punch at the end of the sentence, the unexpected turn to something else. He is very good at that.
Mrs. DeRaps, I had never thought about readers in the way Vonnegut describes them either. It is such and interesting an surprising and true look, yes? Reading is no passive activity!
Litlove, I’ve not read much Vonnegut but he is very good if you should ever decide to give him a try.
abo, thanks for the recommendation! I’ve been wanting to try some his science fiction stuff!
Danielle, hang in there, your vacation will be soon! Reader as a talented performer is a very empowering perspective, isn’t it? I kind of like it because we do work, the author does a lot, but the book is not complete without a reader.
Shelley, thanks for the information about about the net neutrality rulings. I’m disappointed in how they came out but it could have been worse. I’ve been following it online and Credo has had several petitions and letters that I have signed and sent. The FCC has a Consumer Help Center where you can also file a comment electronically on any of their proposed rules.
Oh my goodness that Kevorkian book sounds like it’d be quite the ride. I’ve not read anything by Vonnegut and I really think I’ve been missing out!
And, I’m pouting because I’m not in vacation mode yet
I’ve only read Slaughterhouse-Five, and while I liked it a lot, it never really occurred to me to read more Vonnegut. Maybe I should! I saw him in Manhattan once, doing a book signing. That was cool
I’ve not read any Vonnegut and feel remiss for not having done so before now. These both sound like good reads. I’m especially intrigued by the one with Dr. Kervorkian. I can imagine you did get a few stares on the bus with that one!