I received a wonderful surprise Solstice gift of The Lost Art of Reading: Why Books Matter in a Distracted Time by David Ulin from the ever generous Richard. You may have caught Ulin’s 2009 Los Angeles Time article by the same title. The book is an expansion on the article and the book is quite good.
Before reading the book I imagined that it was going to be a rant against technology and a paean to the glory of books with lots of wailing about why no one reads anymore. This book is not that. Instead, this is a thoughtful consideration about the interplay of books and technology and how technology is both a good thing and a bad thing for books and a reading life.
Ulin is a book critic for the LA Times, it is his job to read and review books. But when he sits down to read for pleasure he discovered, one day, that he was unable to sink into a book and lose track of time and the world like he used to be able to do. He kept interrupting his reading to check his email, look at news feeds, turn on the television. His worry about keeping on top of things and not missing out, of staying connected in our 24/7 always on world was getting in the way of sustained and concentrated reading. But Ulin didn’t stop to think about it – no time! – until one day when his fifteen-year-old son who was reading, and disliking, The Great Gatsby at school, told him literature was dead.
Thinking he would help his son with his reading and prove to him what a great book Gatsby is, Ulin began reading it that evening figuring that a few hours should be enough to catch up to where his son was in the book. It’s then that it hits home how difficult reading nonstop for a few hours had become.
But Ulin isn’t against technology. He even admits that sometimes when he is reading it is nice to be able to look something up for clarification or a different perspective. Technology can enhance our reading experience. He even owns a Kindle, but doesn’t read on it much by the sound of it. No matter really. He thinks, hopes, ereaders could possibly turn more people into regular readers.
But at the same time that technology and our connected world can enhance the reading experience, it also hinders it. It pulls our attention away from books, doesn’t give us time to think, keeps us from stepping back, from deeply engaging with an idea, a thought, a daydream. Ulin writes:
And yet, we live now in a culture where the Great Leap Forward happens every minute, where time and context have grown so condensed that even anxiety doesn’t hit us fast enough. How do we pause when we must know everything in an instant? How do we ruminate when we are constantly expected to respond? How do we immerse in something (an idea, an emotion, a decision) when we are no longer willing to give ourselves the space to reflect?
What I like so much about this book is that Ulin doesn’t have an answer to any of the many questions he asks. He explores possibilities and always brings it back to himself because he is implicated in the problem. It is not “people out there” or technology or any one thing in particular that is the source of our go-go-go world. Rather it is a way of being in the world that we have got ourselves into without paying much attention and now we are beginning to lift up our heads and wonder what the heck happened, how’d we get here? And where is here, exactly?
The one conclusion that Ulin does reach is that reading is still important, perhaps more important than it ever had been. Reading, in our 24/7 world becomes
an act of resistance in a landscape of distraction, a matter of engagement in a society that seems to want nothing more than for us to disengage. It connects us at the deepest levels; it is slow, rather than fast. That is its beauty and its challenge: in a culture of instant information, it requires us to pace ourselves. What does it mean, this notion of slow reading? Most fundamentally, it returns us to a reckoning with time. In the midst of a book, we have no choice but to be patient, to take each thing in its moment, to let the narrative prevail. Even more, we are reminded of all we need to savor – this instant, this scene, this line. We regain the world by withdrawing from it just a little, by stepping back from the noise, the tumult, to discover our reflections in another mind. As we do, we join a broader conversation, by which we both transcend ourselves and are enlarged.
Yet knowing this doesn’t make it any easier for Ulin to read. He admits in the end he still has difficulty but he keeps at it anyway.
The thoughtfulness of the book is what I liked best. That Ulin doesn’t take any kind of moral high road but declares himself guilty from the beginning and tries to figure out what the heck is going on drew me in, made me like the guy. While I don’t have any troubles falling into a book, I was able to relate all too well. There are times when I try to read that I am distracted, email, Twitter, blogs, computer games, all seem more interesting than the book.
Today I watched the Twilight Zone episode Time Enough at Last in which the world is destroyed by a nuclear war and the bookworm survives because he was in the bank vault on his lunch break reading. He almost kills himself in despair but then he finds the remains of a library and he is giddy with excitement because he now has all the time he could ever want to read. Of course it is the Twilight Zone so things don’t quite work out as planned. I suppose what it comes down to is somehow finding a balance between being connected to the world and getting lost in a book. There is no right balance for everyone, we all have to find what works for us and it may not be easy but we have to keep reading anyway.
This sounds like a great, thought-provoking book. When I lived in Finland I had TONS of time to read… I didn’t have to be at school, I didn’t work, I spent countless hours on the bus… it was heaven. Of course I had a very limited scope of books to read (what was on hand at the university library) but even that was nice because I just worked my way through the stacks and didn’t get overwhelmed by choice. I don’t seem to have to time (or make time) for hours and hours of reading, but I can kill two hours at a time with no problem at all. When I’m on a long flight, 4-5 hours goes by with a good book like nothing.
I take a book with me wherever I go. That sounds simple but my family teases me when I visit them – book in hand. My grandfather was a compulsive reader and his family was more inventive than mine. They would hide their books – not difficult in that family who were except for grandfather not reading people. He would find a book that they had missed and read it regardless of subject.
Bob – I ALWAYS have reading material with me too!
This is a very timely post for me. Just before Christmas I began Susan Hill’s book ‘Howard’s End is on the Landing’ which was in part the result of her having come to the same conclusion and it immediately had resonance for me. I know that over the past few years I have stopped reading in the same concentrated way that I used to and, even worse, stopped thinking deeply about whatever I do read. Now you point me in the direction of another book just in time for New Year and the resolutions that go with it. Thank you. I’m off now to see if ‘The Lost Art of Reading’ is available on this side of the Atlantic.
Lovely summary of what sounds like an interesting book. The thing that has bothered me the most recently is the lack of time to ruminate on what I read. Of course, I have the time if I really want to, but I feel driven by so much to read, blog posts to write, and so on … I feel I’m not engaging so much when I read and that worries me.
Ooh excitement! I was given this book for Christmas! So really delighted that you enjoyed it – bodes very well for me. I am sure I will appreciate his measured and sensitive tone. But I don’t think I have the life/reading balance right; I really would much rather read.
I can so relate to “distracted reading” & I blame it on technology (though I know it is really my “fault”)! On my one hour commute each way I’m on my iPhone most of the time checking email, facebook & playing the recently discovered Angry Birds game……. I LIKE to read but just seem to never have enough time! I always say – I just want to sit & read but never do b/c of all my distractions……. Maybe I should make a New Year’s resolution to read FIRST then as a reward I can check email & facebook & play Angry Birds……..
Oh but Helen, if you need a reward for reading, I’m not sure that reading is what you really want to do? Don’t beat yourself up … just do what you most enjoy!
Great post! I received a Borders gift card for my recent birthday and an Amazon gift card for Christmas, one of which will likely to be used to purchase this book. I don’t have any problem losing myself in a good book, and I’m rather ambivalent about the effect of technology on reading. Right now, I’m reading Middlemarch, and I just last week told someone that there were moments when the story concerned the changing political times in England that I wished I had an e-reader. Then I could quickly access the web and find out exactly what the situation was. However, I could also see myself getting caught up in researching then allowing myself to be distracted by other things like email, twitter, facebook. Besides, the more I read the more I realized that I don’t have to know the history of England to enjoy Eliot’s great book, and I can always look things up on my computer when I’m not lost in the book itself. So, I don’t really need an e-reader at all.
It’s great to read your sympathetic, thoughtful post on this book, Stefanie, because I had heard about it and assumed it would be yet another hysterical anti-technology jeremiad. So glad to hear it’s not. Ironically, since I started blogging about my reading I feel like I’m actually diving deeper into what I read and taking more time to sit with each book and really give some thought to what the author was doing, how they were doing it, and my own reactions as well. But I do understand how the constant stimulation of technology would eat away at a person’s ability to slow down and focus, especially someone so involved in media as a writer for the LA Times. Sounds like a thought-provoking read!
Daphne, your mention of the limited reading material you had in Finland reminds me that Ulin mentions how Milton was able to say he had read every book ever printed and it was true. The wealth of choices we have for reading today can also be a distraction of sorts. Granted, it is not one that we necessarily mind, but it does mean that fewer and fewer people read the same books which adds to cultural fragmentation in a way.
Bob, I always have a book with me too. Your grandfather sounds like he was a wonderful soul.
Annie, I hope you find and enjoy The Lost Art of Reading. And thank you for reminding me of Howard’s End is on the Landing, that’s one I’d like to read but keep forgetting about!
whisperinggums, yes, I know what you mean about feeling as though you don’t have enough time to think about what you have read. I feel that way at times too, like I’ll think about something just long enough to write a blog post about it and then, poof! it’s gone and I’m on to something else.
Litlove, oh, I can’t wait to hear what you think of the book! There is so much in it I had to leave lots out so I look forward to seeing what resonates for you in it.
Helen, Angry Birds? Just thinking of what that game could be is making me smile. I think your idea of reading first and then doing the other things after might be something worth trying. Couldn’t hurt, right?
Kim, thanks! I hope you enjoy the book. You have managed to capture both the potential benefits and pitfalls of being able to look stuff up about the book you are reading. But like you also point out, knowing all that background information isn’t especially necessary to understand and enjoy the story.
Emily, I was worried it would by hysterical too and was pleasantly surprised. I agree that blogging can help one dive deeper into books but sometimes, I know for me, it also makes me feel rushed to finish and to have something to say. Maybe that is a result of squeezing my reading and blogging in between work and school. Ulin’s is a thought-provoking read though, worth the time if you feel so inclined.
Looks like a great book! I placed a reserve for it at the library. Looks like it will be an eBook
Gary
DogberryPages
Well, even though I’m not nearly as connected as other people I will admit to having spent far more time on the computer this break than I had planned. The idea was for long uninterrupted stretches of reading, which have only sort of materialized. This book sounds really good, and very even handed. My library is getting it so I will watch for it to arrive and check it out! Now, I guess I should unplug and go read my book!
First of all, thanks goodness for the lack of anti-technology wailing! This sounds a lot more interesting than I’d have assumed at first glance, and the thoughtfulness in particular makes it sound very appealing. I don’t have much of a problem diving into a book for a few hours at the time, but I think I’d still be able to related to the need to stay on top of things and how that can suck hours from your life.
Pingback: The Lost Art of Reading | Of Books and Bicycles
I just wrote my own post on this book (and I quoted a piece of one of your quotations as well — the book’s last couple pages were really great!). I agreed with your assessment — surprisingly thoughtful and fair (only surprising because I expected something much more negative).
You liked the fact that Ulin doesn’t have an answer to the many questions he asks. That interests me. Do you prefer unanswered to answered questions? And if so now, I’d be interested in why?
I actually started this, but then I got sidetracked by a few other books. *sigh*
I think technology is definitely doing something to our attention spans. Our brains have evolved to seek and take pleasure from new information, so it’s no wonder we can’t resist the stream (or fire hose) of real time updates coming at us these days. It’s as physical an addiction as any other, and like all addictions we get inured to whatever dose we’re taking and crave more and more. Add to that the fact that the brain physically changes in response to how we use it, and I think the situation merits some questions. According to neurologists, the ability to concentrate, that is, block out distractions, seems to be directly connected to overall intelligence. So what happens to a society when everyone’s ability to concentrate is weakened? Intelligence has been increasing over time, but is it possible our distracting technologies might reverse this trend? We will have to wait and see, but I think readers might be the canary in the coal mine. If some of us (myself included) are having more trouble concentrating now, what does that say for society at large?
Gary, I hope you enjoy it!
Danielle, I totally know what you mean about spending more time on the computer during your vacation than you intended. I’ve been goofing around doing all sorts of things I didn’t mean to but it’s all mostly been book related in one or another so that’s ok, right?
Nymeth, the book is a pleasant surprise and not at all what I expected. I love it when my expectations are foiled for the better!
Dorothy, it’s funny that we both ended up reading this at the same time and both expected it to be a negative reading experience. It is nice to be surprised.
Richard, I’m sure there is a joke in there with your questions about why I like unanswered questions but I am at a loss to come up with it at the moment. So as a brief and vague answer, I am glad he didn’t have answers because I don’t think there are any right now.
softdrink, better sidetracked by other books than by the computer!
Sylvia, my scientist friend, I think you are right about attention spans. Our plastic brains can’t help but be altered by technology. If only we could find a way to get technology to alter our brains for the better instead of shortening our attention spans. If what you say is true about the ability to concentrate, then those who can concentrate will rule the world. Therefore those of us who can still manage to read will end up being in charge. What a day that will be!
Sylvia, sadly you are probably right about charisma counting more than intelligence, if it weren’t true Sarah Palin wouldn’t be in the news all the time! We’ll keep working on those chickens
Interesting. I don’t have the attention span I used to for books but I put it down more to circumstances than technology but I think that it’s true, there’s a lot of distraction that happens nowadays and an attention level that I’ve gotten used to.