AfterWord: Conjuring the Literary Dead, a collection of essays edited by Dale Salwak, is my first NetGalley read and I am sure it won’t be my last.
AfterWord is not quite what I expected but that is not a bad thing. What I expected was a book of somewhat lighthearted essays by authors imagining conversations with their favorite dead authors asking them things like, as John Halper does in “A Tardy Talk With Edith Wharton,” did Lily Bart commit suicide or was it an accident? (Imagined Wharton offers an answer but I’m not telling what it is). There are plenty of such essays but there are also plenty that do some serious biography and literary criticism as well. So it ends up being a nice mix of fun and fanciful and thoughtful and serious. One thing that does run through all the essays is the living writer’s love of and appreciation for the work of the dead writer. As Salwak notes in his introduction:
while the book began as an inquiry into the connection between the living and the dead, it became an exploration of the relationship between author and text, between reality and imagination.
Margaret Atwood’s opening essay, “Negotiating with the Dead,” is a reprint from her book Negotiating with the Dead: A Writer on Writing and alone is worth the price of admission.
But there are also wonderful essays on Samuel Johnson, Henry James, Edith Wharton, Oscar Wilde, and a somewhat snooty Jane Austen just to name a few. In the Austen essay, Eugene Goodheart questions Austen about why Emma is her favorite character and whether she really thought that Emma and Mr. Knightley would have a happy marriage.
Carl Rollyson writes a fascinating essay in which he meets William Faulkner and manages to blend musings on biography and literature and how the two interact to great effect. At one point “Faulkner” says
Novelists’ lives are not novels, their characters are never traceable back to their creators.
Rollyson doesn’t entirely agree. It is a pleasure to read the back and forth between Rollyson and “Faulkner” each using Faulkner’s biography to make his point.
Even when the essayist takes a more serious approach, it is always fun to see how they actually contrive to “meet” the chosen author. Dreams, a time machine, a sudden and inexplicable appearance of the living author outside the dead author’s door. I found it curious that a good many of the essayists went back in time to the author instead of the author coming forward in time to the essayist.
Unfortunately, AfterWord isn’t due to be published by the University of Iowa Press until early May. Put the book on your wishlist so you don’t forget about it!
I hadn’t noticed this on NetGalley, but I’m off to look for it straight away. Thanks for the tip. Coincidentally I was talking to someone yesterday whose research is based around the drug that Lily Bart used to ‘medicate’ herself. I shall have to draw his attention to this essay.
This sounds like something I would love to read. Making mental notes now to look out for it in May.
Sounds intriguing. And, since you’re being mean, I’m going to have to read it myself to find out what Edith Wharton says about Lily Bart!!
As for Jane Austen … good one. There are those in my group who are very cranky about Emma ending up with Mr K.
Annie, I hope you get a copy of the book and enjoy it. And what an interesting topic of research your friend has!
Litlove, I can imagine that you would have a good time with this book.
Whisperinggums, sorry to mean!
Mr K’s and Emma’s pairing just doesn’t seem quite right to me though I don’t get cranky about it. But it was fun that “Jane” gets a little uppity about why she did what she did. I’m not sure I can agree with her, but it was food for thought.
I’ll clearly have to read it. There are, in fact, a few interesting pairings in JA – or, ones that don’t meet the dashing exciting matches like Elizabeth and Darcy. What about Fanny and Edmund? There are those in my group who thinks she should have married Henry. And then there’s Elinor and Edward – he’s not your dashing hero type is he? Oh, one can talk for hours about Jane!!
Somehow I always think that Fanny and Edmund deserve each other. Elinor and Edward, neither of them are exciting. I imagine they settle into a nice “old married couple” sort of life before the honeymoon is even over
They sent it straight away!
Excellent! enjoy!
Hi Stefanie: Thanks for the alert. It does sound like an interesting book. Richard
This sounds wonderful, thanks for the heads up. Imaginary conversations with writers plus some decent lit crit – nice mix!
This sounds absolutely wonderful! And I’m glad to hear you enjoyed the Atwood essay in particular, as I’ve been eyeing the book where it was originally published every time I go to the library.
Oh no, I’ve not read that Edith Wharton novel…not that I am not expecting something really depressing…but I will blank any mention of Lily Bart from my mind. I would however be curious about Emma and Mr. Knightley, but then I always have been nosy.
I have this book from NetGalleys (your mention of it in your first Net Galleys post got me started on the whole thing!) and am looking forward to it. It’s just the kind of thing I like. I’m glad to know about the mix of essays so I know better what to expect.
Richard, hello friend! I somehow imagine you would probably enjoy this one.
Michelle, it is a nice mix.
Nymeth, I’ve read the boo the Atwood essay was originally published in and it is quite good I think. So check it out next time you are at the library!
Danielle, I don’t think I’ve given anything away. You will still enjoy House of Mirth when you get to it, promise.
Dorothy, I thought I recalled you making mention once that you had the book too. I look forward to finding out what you think of it.
Pingback: AfterWord: Conjuring the Literary Dead | Of Books and Bicycles