Part of my four-day holiday weekend has been spent thinking about Roberto Bolaño’s 2666. The book is huge, almost 1,000 pages. It is Bolaño’s final novel. He was still working on it when he died in 2003. The book is finished, he was doing some final revising, all the major work and revisions already complete. The book is broken up into five sections that Bolaño had thought he would like to publish separately, but in the end agreed that it would be easier for the publisher and his family to publish them as one work.
It is natural to provide a plot summary when talking about a book, but in this case it is impossible to do. There is no plot as we think of plots. Section one, “The Part About The Critics” follows four literary critics obsessed with tracking down the elusive German author Benno von Archimboldi. A rumor eventually takes them to the fictional city of Santa Teresa Mexico but they do not find him there and the section just kind of ends. Part two is “The Part About Amalfitano” who is a professor are the University of Santa Teresa and whom we meet in part one as one of the people who show the critics around town. “The Part About Fate” follows journalist Oscar Fate who is sent to Santa Teresa to cover a big boxing match. But Fate is not a sports writer and while there gets interested in investigating and writing about the many women who have been murdered and who are continuing to be murdered in the city. He also meets Amalfitano’s daughter and saves her from being numbered among the murdered women.
Part four, “The Part About the Crimes” is the hardest part of the book to get through, not because it is hard to read but because of the crimes. It is three hundred pages of emotionless recounting of the discovery of the bodies of murdered women in Santa Teresa. The account of bodies is mixed in with the futile efforts of a corrupt police department; a love affair between one of the police officers and woman who runs a hospital for the mentally ill that he consulted to try and gain some insight into the killer or killers of all the women; a psychic who “sees” some of the women who are murdered; Klaus, who is arrested as the serial killer of all the women but who obviously is not since the murders don’t stop after his arrest; and a few other stories woven in and out and around the murder of women. Santa Teresa, you may have heard, is based on the real Mexican city of Juarez where hundreds of women have been murdered since 1993. It is also a focal point for Mexico’s drug war.
Finally, part five, “The Part About Archimboldi” bookends everything. It does not come full circle, however. The critics make no appearance at all. What we get is Archimboldi’s life story, who he really is and why he is so hard to track down. The section and the book ends with him heading off to Santa Teresa.
This is one of those books that will benefit from a reread or two. But from my first pass through, one of the things that really stood out and that flows through all of the sections is madness. Madness comes in many forms. It can be the madness of obsession, like the critics flying around the world just to try and meet Archimboldi. Madness can also come from physical and mental dislocation, from pursuing a line of thought that goes nowhere, and from grief. Violence can also be a form of madness and in the book is evidenced by WWII and murdered women in Santa Teresa. It is frightening how much madness there is in this book. Not all of it is bad, but it leaves the reader, me, wondering if there is such a thing as sanity and if so, what does it look like exactly?
A book as big as this has a little bit of everything in it. There are funny parts and sad parts, boring parts and page turning parts, head scratching moments and aha! moments, beautiful lyrical description and brutal clinical description. The book is easy to read and hard to read. It is a book that can’t be placed in a tidy category. I liked all this about it, its mysteries and surprises. I like that having just read it once I don’t have it al figured out and that in spite of knowing how much work it is to read, how much time it takes to get through, I want to read it again sometime in order to see what else is there. And I know that when I read it again I will be rewarded for my efforts.
If you are planning on reading 2666 I wouldn’t recommend reading a lot about it beforehand in an effort to prepare yourself for it. Just dive in and see what you find, let it caress you and chafe you, let it confuse you and piss you off and tease you, and let it cast its magic spell over you. However, if you do insist on reading a little more about it, there are a couple of good reviews at New York Magazine Book Review, Time Magazine where it was chosen best book of 2008, The New York Times Sunday Book Review, and Slate.
What a great review – I’ve seen other people try to provide cohesive plot summaries and they usually end up coming out muddled, so I’m glad to see you found another way to do it. I also love your advice about just diving in – the best way to handle most chunksters, in my opinion! Thanks for a great review!
Oh well done! It is a kind of Mt Everest of books (I have it looming on my TBR) and I always enjoy reading blogs about someone who’s done it – and enjoyed it.
Lisa
So glad to hear you enjoyed 2666, Stefanie. I think of all the new to me novels that I’ve read in the last couple of years, only Melville’s Moby-Dick and the first volume of Proust’s In Search of Lost Time packed the same sort of emotional wallop and only Perec’s Life A User’s Manual provided the same sort of storytelling virtuosity for me. I was profoundly shaken when I was done with it but, like you, definitely up for a reread some day. On your point about madness, I thought one of the most provocative aspects of the work was how all the killings in Santa Teresa/Juárez almost paled when set against the backdrop of the large-scale brutality of the World War II sequences. It was like Archimboldi couldn’t escape the horrors anywhere. Anyway, will look forward to hearing what you think of whatever Bolaño you decide to read next and will recommend Nazi Literature in the Americas and Distant Star as the best among his shorter works (The Savage Detectives might still be my favorite Bolaño of all, though). Cheers!
Brave of you take a stab at describing the book! I like how Slate calls it “an epic of whispers and details, full of buried structures and intuitions that seem too evanescent, or too terrible, to put into words.” It defies, if not murders, the question, “What is it about?” It’s more of an experience than a book.
I really loved Bolano’s stories – Last Evenings on Earth – when I read them a while back. I’ve never had the nerve to try his longer novels, not least because I struggle with more than 500 pages. I do have The Savage Detectives to read, though, and will tackle it one of these fine days!
Chelsea, thanks! The book defies description, doesn’t it? It asks you to try and say what it’s about but makes it impossible for you to do so. You have to come at it slant, I think, rather than head-on like a traditional novel.
Lisa, thanks! It is an Everest of a book. Whenever you pick it up off your pile I do hope you like it.
Richard, it does sort of turn everything inside out and upside down, doesn’t it? Nothing is what you expect. And I didn’t even mention all the dreams! The violence of WWII does overshadow the Santa Teresa murders. The story of the German administrator in pt 5 who received 500 Jews and was told to take care of them made me feel sick to my core. I have Savage Detectives on my shelf. After I recover from 2666 I think I’ll give that one a go, but I will definitely read all of his other works too.
Sylvia, thanks! I liked the Slate description too, so very apt. It does defy the question what is it about. Bookman asked me that question the other day while we were out for a walk and I spent half an hour telling him about the book and still felt like I had said nothing about it.
Litlove, having read the long I am curious about the short. If/ when you do read 2666 I will be very interested to hear what you make of it.
This sounds really interesting and I’m glad you liked it and didn’t find it too overwhelming (then again, did you find it overwhelming….I have a feeling it’s the sort of book that evokes all sorts of emotions!). I have the three book set so maybe I should just pull out the first one and dive right in!
Yay, 2666! There will always be a special place in my heart for 2666. When I was writing about the end I also had the temptation to use the “comes full circle” language but then realized that’s not exactly what happened. Maybe what most struck me about it is Bolaño’s sheer inventiveness – all the little details, like the story about the mug factory in Part 1, or Amalfitano’s sinister math book in Part 3. It’s weird to say it about such a dark and violent book, but I had so much fun watching Bolaño’s mind at work.
Great review Stefanie. I think yours is what’s actually told me the most about the book and what to expect! I can tell you honestly right now I would not dive into this book but hopefully one day I’ll decide to give it a go.
Danielle, it wasn’t overwhelming at all. Though I found myself wondering throughout what exactly the book was about and thinking there must be some kind of payoff at th end. But there isn’t. There is nothing that wraps it all together to help the reader make sense of things which turns out, I think to be part of the point.
Emily, some of the details and side stories are wonderful, aren’t they? At first I kept expecting them to be important to the story. I mean there must be a purpose for such sometimes lengthy digressions, right? But no, most of the time it turned out just to be an interesting diversion. Watching Bolano’s mind work, yes, that was definitely fun. It is really too bad he died so young.
Iliana, thanks! If you ever decide to read it I hope you find it worthwhile. And if you never read it, I’m sure you will have read plenty of other worthy books instead.
Isn’t this book crazy! It’s one digression after another.
Now go back and reread the opening of The Part About Fate and tell me that isn’t absolutely horrifying.
Isabella, definitely crazy! I will have to reread the opening of The Part About Fate for sure since I can’t exactly recall it at the moment.
Well, this is probably the closest I’ve come to wanting to read this book! I does sound intriguing; I like your description of all the variety and inventiveness. I would struggle with the descriptions of women’s deaths, but it sounds like it’s worth it.
If I actually do read the books on my list (and the further into the year we go the more I question I’ll achieve this little goal…), I’ll get to find out for myself!
Dorothy, I bet you would find this book really interesting because it is very inventive. I have never read a book quite like it before. The descriptions of all the dead women was really hard to read and are why it took me so long to finish the book because I could only read a few pages at a time in that section.
Danielle, if/when you read it I hope you enjoy it and I look forward to hearing what you think of it!
Just stumbled upon your blog and went to this post because 2666 was one of my favourite reads of the year so far. You give the flavour of the book in your post. I look forward to reading more of your reviews.
My post on 2666 is here, if you’re interested. http://theknockingshop.blogspot.com/2011/01/100-books-in-2011.html
Pingback: 2011 Reading in Review « So Many Books