Feed on
Posts
Comments

Library School Update

Ever have one of those weeks where it seems you are so busy you can’t even think and then you get to the end of it and can’t even say why it was so busy let alone what you did? This has been one of those weeks. I know one thing I did was this week’s assignment for class: create a wiki. The point was to show us how easy it is to create a webpage. Been there done that. What was hard was keeping it simple, but pbwiki, the wiki site we were to use, made keeping it simple a frustrating endeavor. I couldn’t change color or layout, didn’t have access to the code to make little formatting tweeks. Made me nuts! But it also kept me from spending more time on it than I did. Here then, is my creation: Ralph Waldo Emerson Wiki. I am tempted to keep the wiki and expand it, but I have no idea where I’d find the time to do that. It always comes down to time, doesn’t it?

Besides the wiki I have no idea what filled my jam-packed week. I am behind on comments and will catch up soon. Not much reading happened either. I know! I was abducted by aliens! That would explain everything including the whacky questions waiting to be answered at the IPL. I have been unable to answer a second reference question yet because the ones available have me flummoxed. Business prospects for Europe? A philosophy book published in the early 20th century, don’t know the author or title but the title was weird, please help? What are the dangers of science? How does one even begin to answer questions like these? I thought answering seven questions would be a piece of cake. Obviously not.

Class is going pretty well this quarter. The summer seems to be barreling along at light-speed. In a week and a half I am supposed to register for the fall quarter! It’s hard to believe I’ve been at this school thing for almost a year now. As fast as it has all gone, it still seems as though it will be ages before I am finished.

Besides reading for school this weekend I hope to get in some fun reading. I have about 30 pages left in Herodotus and hope to finish him off. Maybe I will be able to start reading The Persians. And who knows what else might be in store. I hope everyone has a relaxing, book-filled weekend!

When the LibraryThing Early Reviewer Program started I didn’t go for it. I had enough books, I didn’t need more. But two months ago I decided, what the heck. I’m glad I–we since my Bookman and I share the LibraryThing account–won a review copy of Mental Sharpening Stones: Managing the Cognitive Challenges of Multiple Sclerosis by Jeffrey N. Gingold.

My Bookman was diagnosed with MS three years ago. Every time he sees his neurologist or nurse they ask him if he has any trouble remembering words. I just thought that word-recall is something that could be an issue. Maybe I was in denial because I didn’t want to think through the implications, but there are a whole lot of cognitive issues possible. So when I first started reading Mental Sharpening Stones I was terrified. The author of the book used to be an attorney. He had to retire from the job he loved because he had problems remembering more than just words. He knows a lot about the cognitive challenges of MS.

Mental Sharpening Stones isn’t just about Gingold. He has essays from people all over the United States who have MS. All of the essays are about their cognitive challenges and the strategies they use to overcome them. Soon, I wasn’t so terrified. Sure, 65% of all people with MS develop some sort of cognitive challenge, but Gingold and the others in the book prove that it doesn’t have to mean the end of living a happy, full life.

The suggestions offered in the book for keeping the mind sharp turn out to be good not only for people with MS. Everyone concerned about keeping their mind active can benefit. The advice includes things like doing puzzles, learning a foreign language, learning how to play the piano, or learning how to do things with your non-dominant hand. This last one gave me an idea. I haven’t been able to knit for almost a year because the tendonitis in my right wrist has been so touchy. So I’ve started teaching myself to knit left-handed. Even though you use two hands to knit, knitting left-handed doesn’t bother my right wrist because it doesn’t have to move as much. I am far from being very good knitting left-handed but that is nothing that practice won’t solve.

My Bookman doesn’t currently have any cognitive challenges other than the ones that he already had before he had MS. But if he ever does, we are better prepared to face those challenges. I recommend this book to anyone who has MS or knows someone with MS. The book is miles away from being depressing. Instead it offers a mental leg up, and a ray of hope and inspiration.

My Bookman read the book too, of course and I asked him to write a few words on what he thought of it:

A great person once said “I Think, Therefore I Am”. I’m pretty sure it was Sherlock Holmes or Spock (the vulcan mind-melder, not the baby mind-melder). Either way, it makes a pretty good mantra for me. You see, I consider myself to be very much smarter than almost everyone else. That is why this troubling neurological disorder called MS is causing me difficulty. My wonderful MS nurse always asks me if i have trouble remembering the correct words for things. I don’t, but I have started to second guess myself and am worried (read terrified) that I might develop these cognitive difficulties that are a symptom of MS.

When LibraryThing gave us (me and the Bookwife, the reason for the above, almost everyone else disclaimer) the option to review Mental Sharpening Stones - Manage the Cognitive Challenges of Multiple Sclerosis by Jeffrey N. Gingold we jumped at the chance. For myself, I wanted to have some points of reference to understand if my fears were founded (unfounded I hoped). This book has several great stories from very successful people who had to make major changes in their lives due to MS related cognitive issues. The great part is the continued hopeful outlook these people have maintained.  There isn’t always a solution to each and every issue that could arise. There is however a great introduction to the possibilities of continuing to live the productive and meaningful lives that we all desire.

A strong focus on some key “mental sharpening stones” is summarized at the end of each person’s story, giving the reader an easy list of things to try. I especially like that you don’t have to take notes or underline the “stones” as they are mentioned. They are all right there, in a nice, accessible list. If you need some ideas to help you stay sharp, or like me, if you aren’t sure how sharp you really are give this book a read. - BookmanJames

Just a Few Things

Tomorrow the world’s oldest New Testament Bible will be viewable online. The Codex Sinaiticus was handwritten over 1600 years ago. Read about here, view it (on the 24th) here.

Is your library on the list of The 25 Most Modern Libraries in the World. My library didn’t make the list but our rival, the Seattle library, did. But then, being modern isn’t everything, right?

Thinking of getting a tattoo? How about a literary one? This site has made me want to get a new tattoo. After my last one I decided my next one had to be bookish like a quote wrapped around my wrist or ankle. But what quote? Or maybe a cartoon-y bookworm? Or something else? Indecision has had hold of me for three years and counting. If you were going to get a literary inspired tattoo, what would it be?

I am at the beginning of the final book of Herodotus. I’m not going to give a blow-by-blow of the sea battles, one of which took place at the same time as the Battle of Thermopylae was going on. This one more of a sea skirmish, but the Persians were dumb enough in their tactics that they ended up losing quite a number of ships.

The second battle really was a huge one. The Battle at Salamis pitted the thousand or so ships of the Greeks against the three thousand ships of the Persians. The Greeks won so decisively that Xerxes took his fleet and all but 300,000 of the land army back to Persia. He left the 300,000 behind at the request of one of his close advisors who was feeling really guilty for telling Xerxes he should go invade Greece in the first place. What he or Xerxes thought the 300,000 could do that the million or so they marched to Greece with couldn’t do, I’m not sure.

It strikes me that the Greeks won by embodying the characteristics they celebrated in Odysseus. Odysseus was a brave warrior, but he was also a master tactician and he was wily. No one will ever say that those who fought on the side of Greece against the Persians were not brave.

As for the tactics, they were brilliant. The Greeks, time and time again from Thermopylae to the sea battles made the Persians come to them. They used the land to their advantage by fighting in confined areas instead of the wide-open. If the Greeks had sailed against the Persians on the open sea they would have been defeated. But because they fought in narrow sea channels, between mainland and an island and in the mouth of a bay, they kept the Persians from being able to take advantage of their numbers.

And the wiliness–remember how the Spartans dressing their hair before battle at Thermopylae freaked out Xerxes so badly he delayed engaging with them for five days? That was mild. At Salamis the leader of the Greek fleet secretly sent a messenger to Xerxes by cover of night to tell him that the Greek ships were scared and were going to sneak away in the dark. This little trick is was got the Persian ships to pull into the bay, they wanted to keep the ships from escaping. Many of the Athenian allies did want to sail away. They disagreed with fighting in the mouth of the bay because there was no where for them to run to if the battle didn’t go their way. Even when they saw they were surrounded they still thought they’d be able to escape and sailed right towards the Persians who were mightily surprised at being attacked. So both sides were forced to engage in battle by the little trick, a trick that essentially won the war for the Greeks.

A note of interest. On the side of the Persians, one of the leaders was a woman, Artemisia. She had her own ship and a handful of others fitted out and sailing under her direction. Xerxes was greatly impressed with her, not only because she was so smart, but also because she was so ruthless. Xerxes was delighted with her at the sea battle at Salamis even though he lost. The Persian fleet was all crowded up into the bay, that ones behind not knowing what was going on and trying to get up to the front and get into the action. The ships in front had nowhere to go, making it easier for the Greek fleet to destroy or capture them. Artemisia, at the front, sees what is happening. She turns her ship to get the heck out of there and ic blocke by other Persian ships. That doesn’t stop her though. She starts ramming the ships on her own side!

She gets away. In his retreat from Greece, Xerxes entrusts his sons to her and her ship. He knew she’d get them safely back to Persia, and, of course, she did.

It was all very exciting reading. There are more battles to come, but the biggies are over. I checked out a copy of Aeschylus’ The Persians from the library and hope to start reading it soon.

Saturday morning it was my turn to volunteer at the welcome desk again. Guess who was the morning’s roving librarian? If you guessed Librarian Mike, then you get a gold star!

He caught me off my guard before my shift even began. He was–gasp–nice! Volunteers don’t get card-key passes to open the locked employee only door so I wait outside the front door just like the patrons. Usually Security Guard Dave who opens the doors sees me and lets me in the employee door. But there was a different security guard there and he didn’t know me from Eve. So I stood there reading and waiting for the main door to open. When from behind me a chipper voice said, “Good morning volunteer!” I looked up to see Librarian Mike smiling at me. “Would you like to come in?” he asked. He let me in the door and then introduced me to Security Guard Bob. It was all so freaky, as if I had stepped into a parallel universe.

Mike’s pleasantness disarmed and unbalanced me. I thought maybe he had turned over a new leaf or something. But a leopard cannot change its spots as the saying goes. And now I think his pleasantness must be some kind of tactic he uses against people like myself who always want to believe the best about others and think that they really can change.

For the next two hours I had to endure Librarian Mike rushing over to the catalog computers to make sure I was only helping patrons apply for library cards. He’d also sneak up behind me when I was talking to patrons and interrupt the conversation to give them the “correct” information.

The worst was just before I left. A woman came in wanting a library card. She was a county resident but not a city resident. The city and county library systems have merged but our library cards aren’t on the same database yet and patrons have to cross-register their cards. But a note for volunteers from the head of patron services let us know that both county and city service desk people now have access to each other’s card databases and can quickly transfer a city patron’s information to the county database and vice-versa. The patron no longer has to fill out an application to register their card. So when the woman asked if she could use her card that she would get that day at the city library at all the libraries, I said yes.

I walked her to the catalog computer and pulled up the library card application for her then left her to fill out the form. In swooped Mike seconds after I walked away. I don’t know what he said to her but I heard he say, “but she told me I could use the card at all the libraries.” And Mike says really loud, “Well, she’s just a volunteer, she doesn’t work here. She just didn’t know.” At that moment I really wished I believed in violence because I wanted nothing more than a gun loaded with stubby library pencils sharpened to to a razor point that I could aim at him and shoot him full of lead. Since I didn’t get my wish, I pretended I didn’t hear a word he said and continued to smile and greet the patrons walking in the door and past the welcome desk.

As soon as the clock clicked noon, the end of my shift, I bolted out of there. Next time Mike tries to convince me he is nice I won’t be falling for it. I might be a little slow sometimes, but I’m not dumb.

Emerson’s essay, “Country Life” was originally the opening lecture of a course given in the Freeman Place Chapel in Boston, 1858. The essay is not really about living in the country. Instead, it’s more about walking and why spending time in the fresh air is good for us.

While we have given up nomadic life for settled homes, our ancient urges are still in us and the desire to travel usually strikes in the spring and summer. But travel isn’t necessarily hopping on a train or boat and going to distant lands. Travel for Emerson means walking around your own district, or, if you must go far, climbing a nearby mountain or visiting the ocean will suffice.

Emerson talks about Linnaeus who, according to Emerson, insists on “the necessity of traveling in one’s own country, based on the conviction that Nature was inexhaustibly rich.” He goes on to tell of Linnaeus taking his students out for day-long walks at least once a week. As fascinating as Linnaeus and his walks must have been, it is the great walker that Emerson knew personally with whom I’d like to spend the day.

Late in the essay Emerson talks about how it is eminently convenient to have a naturalist living in your town and how every town should have one. He explains that a “true naturalist” can go wherever he wishes even onto farmer’s lands who would rather he not cross them. But the farmer can do nothing about it and, Emerson implies, the naturalist has more right to be there than the farmer does. Then he made me laugh out loud:

My naturalist [emphasis mine] knew what was on their [the farmers'] land, and the farmers did not, and sometimes he brought them ostentatiously gifts of flowers, fruits or rare shrubs they would gladly have paid a price for, and did not tell them that he gathered them in their own woods. Moreover the very time at which he used their land and water (for the boat glided like a trout everywhere unseen) was in hours when they were sound asleep. Before the sun was up, he went up and down to survey his possessions, and passed onward and left them, before the second owners, as he called them, were awake.

Emerson’s naturalist was his dear friend Thoreau whom Emerson seems to have possessed as Throeau possessed the farm fields and woods. What a pair these two are and how I wish I could go back in time and follow them unseen as they trooped through the countryside.

As simple as we might think walking is, Emerson laments that few know how to take a walk. He has often thought of publishing a book, Art of walking, with Easy Lessons for Beginners. Too bad he didn’t! However, we get glimpses of what it is he would have said in his book.

No one starts out as a good walker. Becoming a good walker takes time and persistence, and years. Beginning walkers are apprentices. If they persist and gain an intimacy with their surrounding country, if they know all the good places to visit within ten miles and the best time and season to visit them, if they know where are the best lakes and hills as well as the best berries and rare plants, and if, even as they know all this they continue to learn, then, we can call these walkers professors. Now, along with all of that,

The qualifications of a professor are endurance, plain clothes, old shoes, an eye for Nature, good humor, vast curiosity, good speech, good silence and nothing too much. If a man tells me that he has an intense love of Nature, I know, of course, that he has none. Good observers have the manners of trees and animals, their patient good sense, and if they add words, ‘t is only when words are better than silence. But a loud singer, or a storyteller, or a vain talker profanes the river and the forest, and is nothing like so good company as a dog.

Simple instructions for how to become a professor of walking. We just need someplace to walk.

The best place for walking is broken country. If you live in Illinois, you are out of luck according to Emerson, because there is no good walking in the entire state. It’s too flat. I’ve never been to Illinois so can’t attest to whether it is as flat and dull as Emerson says it is. While we want broken country, we also don’t want anything too hilly because too much climbing is no fun. We want changes of view and surprises, not pitons and Sherpas. And if our walking happens to take us by an abandoned orchard, all the better. Emerson drools over pears, peaches and cherries gone wild, but especially apples. Emerson had his own apple orchard and cultivated dozens and dozens of varieties so he was something of an apple connoisseur.

Walking “is one of the secrets for dodging old age,” suggests Emerson. Walking in a forest awakens in one the same feelings as it did when one was young. Plus, it allows us to see that it is “the old trees that have all the beauty and grandeur.”

Walking also cures insanity. There are plenty who are insane that are not in hospitals. You can see them in crowded cities, hotels, theatres, and among the speculators rushing to invest, more, more more! The power of the open air and a field will restore the mental health all but the worst off.

A walk in Nature not only exercises the body but also the brain. There is nothing as good as fresh air to wake up the mind. Walking also brings us nearer to the source of all things. We are humbled before our Creator and the immensity of life.

Emerson nicely sums up his thoughts about walking thusly:

I think ‘t is the best of humanity that goes out to walk. In happy hours, I think all affairs may be wisely postponed for this walking. Can you hear what the morning says to you, and believe that? Can you bring home the summits of Wachusett, Greylock, and the New Hampshire hills? the Savin groves of Middlesex? the sedgy ripples of the old Colony ponds? the sunny shores of your own bay, and the low Indian hills of Rhode Island? the savageness of pine-woods? Can you bottle the efflux of a June moon, and bring home the tops of Uncanoouc? The landscape is vast, complete, alive. We step about, dibble and dot, and attempt in poor linear ways to hobble after those angelic radiations. The gulf between our seeing and our doing is a symbol of that between faith and existence.

Go on. Go outside. Go for a walk.

Next week’s Emerson: Concord Walks

I answered my first real reference question last night for the Internet Public Library. My success came after a disappointment two days before. The first attempt on Wednesday evening made me a little worried.

I logged in to the IPL secret librarian backroom and looked over the questions waiting to be answered. There was one that seemed like it shouldn’t be too hard for my first time out. The guy wanted information about the inventor of the Swedish tiled stove. He had the inventor’s name and dates and everything. How hard could this be? Ha! Forty-five minutes later I had found one website but even that one wasn’t golden because half the information was in Swedish. I did find out the inventor was an architect so I looked him up in an architect encyclopedia. Nothing. I browsed several different architecture websites. Nothing. I tried different search engines. I even logged into Worldcat and looked for books. Nothing. Or I should say there may have been lots but it was all in Swedish so I wasn’t sure.

Finally I decided I couldn’t answer the question and was very glad I hadn’t claimed it so my name would show up on it. As I was logging off though I noticed that two others before me had claimed it and then unclaimed it. No doubt they ran into the same roadblocks as I did. There are also actual working librarians doing reference for IPL too, not just students, so I figured one of them was going to have to field that one.

It was with a bit of trepidation that I logged in last night to see what questions were waiting. Someone wanted to know what ten banks were most likely to fail. Yikes! There were a couple of business questions and a soil science question and a few questions I read and didn’t even understand. And then I came to one asking for information about Martin Luther’s 95 Theses. Only she had the number wrong. This was a question I could answer!

It took me only about half an hour to find all the internet resources to send her but it took an hour for me to write it all up in the proper format. I hope that gets faster as I get more familiar with it. What I sent was a link to the 95 Theses, a study guide, a biography of Luther, a link to a website dedicated to Luther that had a timeline and legends and bits of curious information, a link to the Luther House museum in Wittenberg, Germany, and a link to the Schlosskirche, the church where Luther nailed his theses to the door and where he is buried. We are only required to send three resources, but I thought it all so interesting I couldn’t not send all of them. I hope I didn’t overwhelm her.

One of the reasons I had such pleasure in finding all the Luther links is because my family is Lutheran. When I was a kid going to Sunday School they never talked about Luther. It was always singing and Bible stories and Bible verse memorization competitions. They talked about Luther in school though–Martin Luther King. And my kid brain sitting in church hearing the pastor talking about Martin Luther thought he was talking about Martin Luther King. And I thought how cool was that? I go to a church started by Martin Luther King, the man who fought for civil rights for black people. And I’d look around and see a couple hundred mostly all-white faces and I thought, how cool is that? All these white people going to a church founded by a black man! I didn’t understand why we didn’t get stand up and clap your hands gospel music though but thought it might have something to do with there being so many old people that attended the church.

Imagine my disappointment when I found out that Martin Luther and Martin Luther King were not the same people. I think I was about 10 or so. Church was never quite the same after that, but I had my answer on why we didn’t have gospel music.

While I had fun looking up the information for the requester, I also got to have fun laughing at my child-self. And no, I didn’t slip in a link about Martin Luther King, though I was tempted.

One reference question down, six more to go.

Yay For New Books!

A few new books have made it onto the piles recently and what good books they are!

  • Book Crush by Nancy Pearl. My Bookman has a book “recycle” barrel at his bookstore so if someone passing through the airport has a book they no longer wish to lug around they can drop it in for someone else to take. He found this copy in the barrel the other day and brought it home to me so it can join the other Nancy Pearl books on my shelf.
  • Motivation and Narrative in Herodotus by Emily Baragwanath. A giftie from my beloved since he knows I have been enjoying Herodotus so much.
  • A Commentary on Herodotus Books I-IV edited by Oswyn Murray and Alfonso Moreno. Another giftie from my Bookman. Isn’t he a sweetie?
  • The Collector of Worlds by Iliya Troyanov. This is a fictional retelling of the life of Richard Burton sent by the publisher, Faber & Faber. It looks like it will be fantastic reading.
  • Also sent from the same publisher, Anonymity: A Secret History of English Literature by John Mullan. It’s a study of why so many great English authors chose to publish their work anonymously. How marvelous does that sound? Too bad I didn’t have it in time to save me from Harold Bloom!

Oh how I love books! But then you’ve probably figured that one out by now :)

Yesterday we had an all-agency Fun Day. All nonessential services were shut down and we carpooled out to Lake Elmo Park Reserve for a picnic and fun and games. The day was unfortunately hot and humid. When I got home at 3 (thank goodness we didn’t have to go back to work afterwards!) I sat down and promptly fell asleep! I woke up have an hour later feeling somewhat refreshed. My Bookman wasn’t going to be home for about two hours and I realized I had been gifted with some unexpected reading time.

I was so excited by this prospect that at first all I could do was bounce up and down like a toddler who is about to get some ice cream. I managed not to squeal and drool, but it wasn’t easy. I looked over my books in progress and none of them called out to me. I need to start a new book, I decided. But what? My happy feelings for Alberto Manguel and his yummy bookishness were still warm in my heart so I thought a book about books would be good. My eye landed on How to Read and Why by Harold Bloom. The book has been on my shelf for quite some time and I thought, sure why not now?

I began to read.

It’s a good thing I wasn’t eating or drinking anything at the time because if I had been I surely would have choked. I’ve read Bloom before and I thought I would be prepared. I also thought perhaps he’d be a little less dogmatic than usual because he is a reader and someone who loves books. I should have known better. The thing about Bloom is that he is Right and everyone else is Wrong. He also has a way of presenting himself as being an embattled speaker of Truth defending Literature from all those feminists and postmodernists and post-structuralists. It’s the feminists he hates the most. The ones who dare criticize his beloved Shakespeare and have the nerve to talk about patriarchy in King Lear:

Putting the tragedy to use as a complaint against patriarchy is to forsake your own prime interests, particularly as a young woman, which sounds rather more ironical than it is.

To be honest, I am not sure I even know what he means by that sentence. What are “prime interests” and how does he know what a young woman’s are?

He spends a bit of time talking about irony and how he thinks contemporary literature is severely lacking in it and how readers are sadly unable to understand it. Thus it was when he finally came round to laying out his principles for how one should properly read, he made me laugh out loud with number one: “Clear your mind of cant.” Now that is irony if there ever was any.

Here then, are Bloom’s five principles for the restoration of reading with which I will be edifying myself in this delightfully annoying little book:

  1. Clear your mind of cant (Maybe he meant “can’t” as in “I can’t read James Joyce because he’s just too hard” and he’s going to tell me to stop being silly.)
  2. Do not attempt to improve your neighbor or your neighborhood by what or how you read. (Huh?)
  3. A scholar is a candle which the love and desire of all men will light. (Lifted from Emerson which I appreciate, but not all of us read in order to be scholars, nor should all reading be done for scholarly reasons)
  4. One must be an inventor to read well. (I would have said one needs to be imaginative, but I think we can get along on this one)
  5. Recovery of the ironic. (He believes irony is necessary to good writing and reading. Why irony is so darn important to him I am not quite clear on)

These are the five principles. The fact that he says they are for the restoration of reading says it all. We shall see if by the time I finish this book my reading will have been been rescued from the mire of radical left-wing thinking and my short attention span, caused by television and the internet, will be returned to at least pre-internet days. Since I grew up with television I don’t think I can restore my attention span to something it never was.

The Battle of Thermopylae has now been fought in Herodotus. I must say it was a bit anti-climactic considering the lead up. I expected more of a blow-by-blow or if not that at least a bit more detail especially about the tactics. Still, it was good reading especially when I began the following chapter and got Xerxes’ reaction.

Before the battle and before even leaving Persia, Xerxes had been warned by an advisor who happened to be a former king of Sparta. Demaratos, went to “the other side” after he was kicked out of Sparta for I can’t remember what now. One has to wonder whose side Demaratos is actually on. Sure he tells Xerxes all about Spartan tactics and that, but he also tells him that one fighting Spartan is worth ten fighting Persians. Xerxes finds this very funny and forgives Demaratos his insubordination.

Xerxes assumes that King Leonidas and his three hundred Spartans waiting at Thermopylae are the elite fighting force, but Demaratos tells him that all Spartans are equal to those three hundred. Xerxes is not buying it because, frankly, he has numbers on his side.

Now the Spartans were not the only ones at Thermopylae, at least not to begin with. There were about two thousand Greeks at the pass from various cities with the Phokians sent up to guard the path around the back way. The pass was not wide enough for all of them to fight in it at the same time so they used it to their advantage in two ways. The first, of course, is that it didn’t allow the Persians to overwhelm them with their numbers. The second is that it allowed the different portions of the Greek army to take turns and therefore have a chance to rest.

The Persians were getting slaughtered. The ferocity of the Greeks, especially the Spartans, was unexpected. Xerxes, of course, thought that once they saw how many they were up against they would flee. He sent out a scout before the battle who reported back that he saw the Greeks having a little athletic competition and casually sitting around and combing and dressing their long hair. Xerxes sent for Demaratos who explained that the Greeks were preparing to die and they would take as many Persians with them as they could. But Xerxes didn’t believe him and was so freaked out about all those soldiers sitting around arranging their hair that he hesitated four days, thinking that the Greeks would leave.

On the fifth day the battle began. Three times during that day Xerxes, watching from a safe distance, leapt up in fear for his army. The fighting ceased at nightfall. It is then that a man named Epialtes, a Malian, told Xerxes about the path through the mountains that would allow the Persians to trap the Greeks in the pass. Epialtes thought he’d get a big reward from Xerxes. No reward is mentioned but he probably did get something. However, when the Greeks ultimately won the war against Persia, Epialtes became a hunted man and was eventually caught and slain.

Now, what the fate of the Greeks at Thermopylae would have been if Epialtes hadn’t squealed can only be speculated. I Imagine the Persians eventually would have withdrawn to try and engage in a battle elsewhere, but by then the army may have been so much smaller and demoralized that the war would have been much shorter than it was. But it doesn’t matter really since that’s not what happened.

The Phokians didn’t defend the path through the mountains like they were supposed to. They turned tail and ran. King Leonidas knew what happened and knew they would all be killed. He then sent everyone away so they could fight again elsewhere, everyone but the Thespians and the Thebans. Leonidas didn’t trust them not to join the Persians, so he made them fight and die for the Greeks.

When Spatans were informed by the opposition that when the “Barbarians” (that’s what the Greeks called the Persians) sent their arrows flying there would be so many the light of the sun would be blocked out, it is Dienekes who replied that it was good news because then he’d be able to fight in the shade. Even though the Spartans knew they were going to die, they took quite a large number of Persians with them as Demaratos warned Xerxes. In fact, there were so many Persians killed in the battle, about twenty thousand according to Herodotus, Xerxes lied to the army about the number. He invited the whole army and fleet to come see all of the dead Spartans but not until he got rid of all but a thousand dead Persians and added a few more dead to the Spartan numbers to make it look like fewer on the Persian side died.

While the Battle of Thermopylae was going on the Athenians were taking on the Persians by sea. But I’ll save that for another post.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »