The Slaves of Golconda pick this time around is Lady Susan by Jane Austen. This is early Jane, composed (probably) in 1795 and revised (probably) in 1805. I’ve read the book before, in a Jane Austen seminar in grad school, but I had absolutely no recollection of it. Obviously it made a huge impression on me, heh. The only evidence I have of reading it before is a few really dumb marginal notes and one or two underlined passages. This time around made more of an impression on me.
The book starts off lively enough with a letter from Lady Susan, widowed 8 months, to her brother-in-law, inviting herself very graciously to his house because she feels she can no longer impose on the kindness of her friends the Manwarings. It is a nice, polite letter and Lady Susan seems such a lovely person until, that is, you get to the next letter Lady Susan writes to her best friend Mrs Johnson. Here we find the truth of Susan’s departure and understand that what Lady Susan says is never the complete truth. It is as Mrs. Johnson says late in the book, “Facts are such horrid things!”
This is a short book but Lady Susan still has time to become engaged, cause a divorce, break off an engagement, and marry someone else. The whole story takes place in letters written by the various people involved. Lady Susan is only 35, old by her time’s standards, but she still has her beauty and charm to make up for not having any money. She is at the mercy of others and hates it. She schemes and charms and flirts and all the men fall in love with her and all the women hate her for it. If she were a man she would be a wealthy businessman with skills like hers. But she is only allowed to operate in the domestic sphere and she must have a living somehow. She must either marry her sixteen year old daughter to a wealthy gentleman over whom she can have some control, or she must find a wealthy gentleman to marry her. Lady Susan reminded me a little of Becky Sharpe in Thackeray’s much later Vanity Fair.
Lady Susan is a finished book but it doesn’t feel finished. The first letter starts in the middle of things which does provide a bit of mystery over whether Lady Susan’s reputation is as bad as everyone says it is so it’s not a bad place to start, I just think it could have been better. And the letters end before the story is actually done. Austen wraps it all up with a straight narrative conclusion of several pages which brings the excitement and liveliness provoked by the letters to a screeching halt. It’s like she didn’t know what to do to finish it so makes up an excuse for the narrative by saying the correspondence could not continue because the rest of the letters really weren’t that interesting.
I found Lady Susan entertaining, but nowhere near the caliber of Austen’s later, famous works. If you are not interested in Austen, the book is probably one to skip. However, if you want to see how her skill developed, how she was playing around with character and structure and dialogue before she hit her stride, then Lady Susan is worth a read.
Everyone is welcome to join in or just eavesdrop on the Slaves discussion at Metaxucafe.
I like your point about Lady Susan not having any satisfying outlet for her energy and abilities — she WOULD be wealthy if she were a man. As it is she can only marry for money.
LikeLike
I’m really enjoying everyone’s posts about Lady Susan, and I will catch up. This is beautifully written as always, Stefanie, with your usual razor-sharp perceptions!
LikeLike
I had to laugh at your comment, too, about how she would have been a successful business man! I think you are right. Here she just seems pretty bitchy, but if she were a man she would be aggressive–but in a good way! It is amazing, however, everything she accomplished in less than 100 pages!
LikeLike
Dorothy, I’ve always thought Austen very good at showing the plight of women during her time and very gutsy for writing about it.
Thanks Litlove, I am looking forward to your thoughts on the book.
The sad part is Danielle, that even today aggressive women are still seen as bitchy. And you are right, it is amazing what Austen can do in 100 pages!
LikeLike
This is the only Jane Austen I haven’t read yet. I’ve always admired her ability to write about the finer points of life, even though a war in Europe was raging at that time. LS is on my TBR list.
LikeLike