This book challenges the conventional wisdom about journalism and its role in our society. Author James O’Keefe argues that we need to rethink how we approach news and information in the 21st century. He offers a new model for journalistic practice, which he calls “muckraking.” This approach is designed to hold powerful institutions accountable and ensure that they are serving the public interest.
For who is this book for ?
This book is for anyone who wants to rethink journalism and its role in our society. It offers a new model for journalistic practice that can help us hold powerful institutions accountable and ensure that they are serving the public interest.
Pros :
- O’Keefe has a refreshing perspective on journalism
- He provides an innovative model for journalistic practice
- The book is well written and enjoyable to read
Cons :
- The author’s ideas may be too radical for some readers
- The book does not offer a lot of specific examples or case studies
- It is difficult to read due to its dense writing style
Learn more about the author
James O’Keefe is a journalist and filmmaker who has been praised for his investigative work. He is the founder of Project Veritas, an organization that seeks to expose corruption and malfeasance in government and corporate institutions.
Reader Reviews
“This is an important book that should be read by anyone who cares about the future of journalism.”
“I really enjoyed this book. O’Keefe has a lot of insightful things to say about the role of journalism in our society, and his proposed model for muckraking is very interesting.”
“This book is a must-read for anyone who cares about the future of journalism. O’Keefe presents a compelling case for why we need to rethink our approach to news and information, and offers a new model for journalistic practice that he calls ‘muckraking.’ This approach is designed to hold powerful institutions accountable and ensure that they are serving the public interest.”
“This is an important book that should be read by anyone who cares about the future of journalism.”